Role Obsolescence: The Work Between the Work Is Disappearing

Most conversations about AI at work start with the wrong question: “Which jobs will AI replace?” That framing assumes the unit of change is the job. What I’m seeing instead is more structural and more disruptive. AI isn’t only replacing tasks. It is collapsing the seams between tasks, and those seams are where many modern job titles have lived.

For the last few decades, organizations have been designed around handoffs. One group plans, another executes, another reports, and another escalates. We built entire professions around managing the friction created by complexity, distance, and delay. Program management is an obvious example, but it’s not the only one. “Coordinator” roles, reporting-heavy analyst work, status-driven operational oversight, even parts of product ownership and functional leadership—many of these roles formed as a response to one persistent condition: information moved slowly, and decision-making was expensive.

AI changes that condition. Not perfectly, and not universally, but enough to rewrite the economics of coordination and the oncoming obsolescence of those job roles.

When information can be summarized instantly, when drafts and updates can be generated in seconds, when risks can be flagged continuously, when meeting notes become structured outputs, and when dependencies can be tracked without a human chasing them down, the old scaffolding starts to wobble. It doesn’t always disappear. Sometimes it compresses. Sometimes it merges. Sometimes it is quietly redistributed to a smaller group of people who know how to run the new system. But the direction is the same: the organization needs fewer “handoff managers” and more people who can guide AI agents and teams so the work can flow.

That is the real collapse: not jobs vanishing overnight, but job categories losing their historical reason for existing.

This is where the word orchestration matters, and why it’s worth treating as a serious capability instead of a buzzword. AI agent orchestration isn’t prompting a chatbot or picking a tool. Orchestration is the craft of designing a workflow in which humans and machines perform different parts of the work intentionally, with clear boundaries, quality checks, and accountability. It is deciding what should be automated, what must remain human, how decisions get made, and how learning loops improve the system over time.

If you've ever entered an organization overwhelmed by status meetings, untrusted dashboards, and governance rituals designed primarily to manage uncertainty, you already recognize the strength of orchestration. These patterns are not merely irritating; they indicate that the operating model is trying to make up for a lack of clarity, feedback, and disciplined decision-making. AI can either exacerbate this dysfunction by adding more noise to the system or aid in reconstructing the infrastructure that truly makes work dependable.

At nuAgility, we talk a lot about resilient human infrastructure: the decision rights, incentives, learning loops, and trust patterns that let teams adapt without chaos. AI does not replace that. If your system is built on ambiguity, political escalation, and “who can generate the best slide deck,” AI will speed up the wrong things. If your system is built on clear outcomes, real feedback, and responsible autonomy, AI can remove waste and elevate judgment.

So how do you remain relevant as job silos collapse? You stop defending the title and start building the capabilities that will keep you relevant.

The first step is to think in terms of workflows rather than responsibilities. Those who remain valuable during this transition are individuals who can trace how value travels through a system and reorganize the flow. They are capable of examining a goal and questioning: What decisions need to be made? What information is required at each stage? Where does uncertainty exist? Where is human judgment necessary? Where is the work repetitive enough to be safely automated? The orchestrator is not someone who simply "owns a checklist." They are the individual who can envision the entire system from start to finish and enhance it.

The second step involves cultivating AI literacy that extends beyond mere "tips and tricks." While becoming a data scientist isn't necessary, it's crucial to understand where AI can be unreliable and why. AI models can be confidently incorrect, overlook context, distort subtleties, and perpetuate bias. Effective orchestration requires more than just generating outputs; it involves designing safeguards. In the upcoming phase, those who advance won't be the ones generating the most AI content, but those who develop reliable, repeatable, and auditable methods for using AI without compromising decision quality.

The third move is shifting from coordination-as-work to judgment-as-work. This is the piece many people miss because it requires an identity change. If your value has been “keeping everyone aligned,” AI agents will do some of that alignment faster than you can. Your new value is ensuring the right problems are being solved, the right trade-offs are being made, and the system is learning. That demands stronger framing, stronger facilitation, and stronger ethics. It also demands the courage to say, “Just because we can automate this doesn’t mean we should.”

Lastly, you emphasize integration as a crucial discipline. In the past, the organization prioritized specialization and distinct role definitions. However, an AI-enhanced organization prioritizes the capacity to connect diverse areas: from business objectives to operational execution, from technological constraints to strategic choices, and from human behavior to adoption challenges. This is why roles are merging. The future favors individuals who can traverse traditional boundaries without creating chaos—those who can interpret, integrate, and lead through complexity.

This isn't a prediction for a distant future; it's already visible in current team staffing, work assignments, and leadership's rationale for headcount.

The breakdown of job silos doesn't have to be a threat. For many, it’s the most direct route to more meaningful work. However, the solution isn't holding onto a title. It's about becoming someone who can orchestrate outcomes—someone who can design how humans and AI collaborate without compromising judgment.

In 2026, many job roles will reach a significant turning point as AI increasingly assumes various tasks. If your role involves coordinating work handoffs, now is the time to embrace AI and human collaboration. This presents an opportunity to enhance your influence by optimizing workflow, improving decision-making quality, and ensuring human judgment is applied where it is most crucial. Most of all, it helps you build a more relevant career as work between work disappears as a human responsibility.

---

Please let us know what you think, and thank you for supporting our work. If you’d like to go a step further, consider becoming a supporting member of nuAgility—your support helps us keep creating and sharing practical guidance that helps organizations adapt and thrive.